A A A
Avatar

Please consider registering
guest

sp_LogInOut Log In sp_Registration Register

Register | Lost password?
Advanced Search

— Forum Scope —




— Match —





— Forum Options —





Minimum search word length is 3 characters - maximum search word length is 84 characters

No permission to create posts
sp_Feed Topic RSS sp_TopicIcon
Re: Diversions - general discussion
December 28, 2010
9:08 am
Avatar
Corey Betke
Cleveland, OH

Invincible Geek
Members
Forum Posts: 255
Member Since:
January 21, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
guy44137 wrote:

Chuck Slusarczyk Jr. wrote:The fifth one never came here, it wound up in Montreal.  As for E18...I'm not sure, but I think that's referring to the pad where the two planes are parked now but I'm sure they'll be moved to an actual gate for boarding.  It's a nice day for pictures though!

Weren't there 4 777's and 1 757 (a 757 is technically a "heavy," no?) in total? Hope you get some more nice shots today.

Back a few months ago the heavy designator was used for aircraft having greater than 255,000 lbs. max takeoff weight, the 752 was just under that and the 753 was over that mark making the 753 a heavy.  Now the new magic number is 300,000 lbs. to be a heavy so the 753 isn't a heavy anymore. 

December 28, 2010
1:31 pm
Avatar
nconrad

Samurai Geek
Members
Forum Posts: 249
Member Since:
January 10, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline
all4golf wrote: Now the new magic number is 300,000 lbs. to be a heavy so the 753 isn't a heavy anymore. 

Who comes up with this stuff?

December 28, 2010
2:08 pm
Avatar
Corey Betke
Cleveland, OH

Invincible Geek
Members
Forum Posts: 255
Member Since:
January 21, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

The FAA is conforming more with ICAO now as everywhere else uses 300,000.  The FAA came up with 255,000 because Boeing didn't want the 757 to become a heavy as it was just less than 255,000 for the max takeoff weight, I believe.  Still didn't really matter as it's used with heavies in wake turbulence.

December 29, 2010
9:35 pm
Avatar
nconrad

Samurai Geek
Members
Forum Posts: 249
Member Since:
January 10, 2010
sp_UserOfflineSmall Offline

Since CLE is a Continental hub, how many of these stranded passengers were able to continue on their journey?  I imagine the only folks on the 777's back to EWR were those for whom that was their final destination!  Where there any passengers on the planes when they left or were the aircraft just being repositioned back to EWR?  Did they consolidate passengers that weren't booked out of CLE?  How did this all work?

No permission to create posts
Forum Timezone: America/New_York

Most Users Ever Online: 679

Currently Online:
11 Guest(s)

Currently Browsing this Page:
1 Guest(s)

Top Posters:

707guy: 530

yakc130: 351

masseybrown: 318

Corey Betke: 255

nconrad: 249

michi: 205

Member Stats:

Guest Posters: 0

Members: 211

Moderators: 0

Admins: 3

Forum Stats:

Groups: 3

Forums: 15

Topics: 1657

Posts: 7300

Newest Members:

bertita, perla67, Barbarahat

Administrators: Mark Plumley: 430, Chuck Slusarczyk Jr.: 1425, Cole Goldberg: 271

Re: Diversions - general discussion | Page 4 | Anything Goes | Forum